I recently received this email from Jared Lucas, who teaches a class for aspiring teachers. Reprinted with his permission.
Hello Mr. Caplan,
My name is Jared Lucas, and I teach American Government as well as a seminar class for students wanting to become future teachers. I teach at a vocational school in Newark, OH. While in college, I listened to your lecture when you came to Bowling Green State University, spoke with you briefly afterwards, and have since purchased your book. I wanted to send you this email to thank you for your work and to tell you what impact it has made on my students (yes, my students) this year. This 9 weeks in my Teaching Careers Seminar, I have been going over numerous controversies in education, and implemented a lesson that spanned a few days over the signaling theory of education. My students were enamored by the subject. I must say that in my 3 years of teaching, I have never had such a passionate discussion burst forth out in my classroom. It was like I unlocked something in their brain that had been dying to reveal itself, yet they didn’t know why. For two days, they discussed a myriad of topics such as abolishing compulsory education, making all high school classes electives, and completely overhauling the mandated curriculum. They spoke from experience how bored they were in school and often wondered what the point was, and perhaps for the first time in their existence, someone presented a plausible answer that made sense to them.
I introduced the topic by asking them questions from lower grades directly from the Ohio state standards, things that theoretically if they passed on to the next grade, they should know. None of them could answer the questions. I asked them: “So what was the point of learning that?” I then gave a brief introduction of the signaling theory and showed them your interview with Reason. They drove the discussion from that point on. At the end of the 9 weeks, I let them write a paper on one of the controversial topics we discussed and to give their position, counter argue the opposing views, and offer up a practical solution. Almost all of them chose the signaling theory of education and many of them wrote FAR beyond the minimum I required.
Since I let them drive the topics we learn (inspired in part by your book), they have proposed that they conduct a survey of the student body with questions inspired by the signaling theory, contact our state representatives, invite them to come in, and advocate that education is DEFUNDED (some contend completely, some say to a degree haha) to prevent academic inflation. I am in awe at the response and zeal they possess to make some change. While I am realistic as to the immediate impact a small group of juniors in high school can make on the entrenched political & institutional structures of our state, I’m hoping my class is only one example of a plethora of other future potential examples of the impact your research may have sparked. Again, thank you for your work!
Sincerely,
Another Whistleblower
READER COMMENTS
Alan Goldhammer
Mar 27 2019 at 2:21pm
Confirmation Bias in Action
Nick
Mar 27 2019 at 9:38pm
Consider it with a grain of salt, I’m no economist, but here’s my takeaway about the education system. I’m a professional Software Engineer with a graduate degree in Engineering.
It has been my observation that even the “real” degrees like Computer Science are filled with unnecessary material that drags an average student through eight whole semesters. The most necessary components, programming, algorithms, data structures and databases are covered fairly early in the program and most of the advanced material is mostly unnecessary and can be learned on the job. The material covered is not wholly useless, but it’s not terribly useful for the average professional programmer either. That said, the degrees usually leave the student wanting in fairly important skills like Coding practices, System Design, Version Controlling, Project Management and others. Modern Software Engineering projects would throw off a new graduate when he encounters them for the first time.
I think the signalling model is largely true, if not completely. If I’m cut some slack, I would insinuate that the proponents of Human Capital model are dissatisfied of the human being. I would go so far as to claim that they believe that humans need to be perfected into “ideal” and “responsible” participants in the “democratic procedure” instead of being free to mind their own business. Is this tendency totalitarian? I wouldn’t go so far, but it’s not a delight either.
Mark Brophy
Mar 28 2019 at 10:55pm
I earned a degree in Computer Systems Engineering 35 years ago and worked as a programmer for 8 years. I agree that most Computer Science degrees are filled with useless studies. Instead of requiring 4-5 years to complete an undergrad degree, it could have been pared down to 2 years. Maybe grad degrees waste less time. Undergrad was simply a jobs program for professors and administrators.
Michael Stack
Mar 29 2019 at 9:50am
Hmmm, my experience was very different. I think a lot of education is wasted time & effort, but my experiences in CS were really valuable to me. I suppose I could argue that 10% or so of the classes were wasted effort for me (like Discrete Mathematics), but I still use the things I learned every day. I think part of the challenge is that a CS education is broad-based, and isn’t the same thing as a “Professional Programmer” degree.
A “professional programmer” degree is available from some of these coding bootcamps, and could potentially be a better choice for some people, but they tend to skip some foundational concepts such as algorithms and data structures.
Comments are closed.